|
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT |
|
 |
|
|
|
THE GENERAL MANAGER |
|
 |
|
J.R. Nereus Acosta, PhD
Secretary/Presidential Adviser
for Environmental Protection |
|
|
|
LLDA MANDATE |
|
The Laguna
Lake Development Authority was established in 1966 as a
quasi-government agency that leads, promotes, and
accelerates sustainable development in the Laguna de Bay
Region. Regulatory and law-enforcement functions are carried
out with provisions on environmental management,
particularly on water quality monitoring, conservation of
natural resources, and community-based natural resource
management.
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Laguna de Bay Institutional
Strengthening and Community Participation (LISCOP)
Project is a five-year developmental
initiative which started in April 2004. This
is jointly funded by a loan from World Bank
(WB), Grant from the Netherlands Government,
LGU equity and corporate counterpart from
LLDA. It aims to assist LLDA, LGUs and other
stakeholders to improve the environmental
quality of the Laguna de Bay watershed. This
will be done through:
-
Encouraging behavioural changes and
implementing activities by watershed
users to improve the environmental
quality of the lake and its environs
-
Improving planning, regulatory
instruments and incentives and
participation in the environmental
management of the Laguna de Bay
watershed
It
is designed to support co-managed
investments implemented by the LGUs and RCs
that will benefit the communities within the
lake and its watershed and support the
institutional strengthening of LLDA, LGUs
and RCs in ensuring sustained and effective
management of the Lake.
|
Component 1
:
Co-managed Micro-Watershed Environmental
Interventions |
Overall physical accomplishment
of this component is 100
percent. Out of the 33
sub-projects completed, 30 or
94% are now operational while
the remaining three sub-projects
are still not operational. The
reasons for not achieving a full
operation of the remaining
three sub-projects are (1) shift
in priority of the new
administration (Majayjay case);
(2) delay in the construction of
the municipal abattoir (Lucban
Case); and (3) Failure of
bidding of equipment (Antipolo
Case).
Printable view
LAGUNA
|
LGU |
SUB-PROJECT/s |
COST (PhpM) |
Physical Accomplishment (%) |
YEAR
COMPLETED |
|
Sta. Cruz |
Waste Water Treatment Facility |
10.4 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
|
Kalayaan |
Sanitary Landfill |
11.2 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
|
Liliw |
Materials Recovery Facility |
4.3 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Rehabilitation of Old Dumpsite |
|
Cavinti |
Environmental
Improvement |
13.8 |
100
completed and operational |
2008 |
|
Siniloan |
Environmental
Improvement |
4.0 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
MRF
Enhancement |
|
Nagcarlan |
Waste Water
Treatment Facility |
5.0 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
|
|
Majayjay |
Environment al
Improvement |
34.8 |
100 completed (deferred operation) |
2009 |
|
Pila |
Materials Recovery Facility |
6.0 |
100
completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Victoria |
Materials Recovery Facility |
5.0 |
100 completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Pangil |
Materials Recovery Facility |
23.0 |
100 completed and operational |
2010 |
|
Environmental
Improvement |
|
|
Pakil |
Materials Recovery Facility |
10.0 |
100 completed and operational |
2010 |
|
Environmental
Improvement |
|
Mabitac |
Materials Recovery Facility |
5.0 |
100 completed and operational
|
2010 |
RIZAL
|
MUNICIPALITY |
NO. of
SUB-PROJECTS |
COST (PhpM) |
Physical Accomplishment (%) |
YEAR
COMPLETED |
|
Tanay |
Environmental Improvement
|
30.6 |
100 completed and
operational |
2008 |
|
Rehabilitation of Old Dumpsite |
100 completed and
operational |
|
Material Recovery Facility
|
100 completed and
operational |
|
Reforestation |
100 completed and
operational |
|
Flood
Control |
100 completed and
operational |
|
Morong |
Material Recovery Facility |
9.9 |
100
completed and operational |
2008 |
|
Teresa |
Material Recovery Facility |
8.1 |
100
completed and operational |
2008 |
|
Angono |
Material Recovery Facility
|
11.0 |
100
completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Taytay |
Flood Control
|
10.0 |
100
completed and operational |
2009 |
|
Baras |
Flood Control
|
10.0 |
100
completed and operational |
2010 |
|
Antipolo |
Material Recovery Facility
|
22.0 |
100 completed (deferred operation) |
2010 |
CAVITE
|
MUNICIPALITY |
NO. of
SUB-PROJECTS |
COST (PhpM) |
Physical Accomplishment (%) |
YEAR
COMPLETED |
|
GMA |
Materials Recovery Facility |
16.6 |
100 completed and operational |
2010 |
QUEZON
|
MUNICIPALITY |
NO. of
SUB-PROJECTS |
|
|
YEAR
COMPLETED |
|
Lucban |
Waste Water
Treatment Facility |
23.0 |
100 completed (deferred operation) |
2011 |
|
Materials Recovery Facility |
18.869 |
100 completed and operational |
General
Status of the 33 sub-projects
under the LISCOP Original
Financing
Laguna de Bay Environmental
Action Planning
(LEAP)
A preparatory activity that
guides the planning,
identification, development, and
implementation of community
sub-project under LISCOP.
LEAP sessions were conducted in
the 24 micro-watersheds in the
Laguna de Bay region. The first
round of LEAP was conducted in
2003, and the second round in
2007. List of municipalities
that participated in LEAP
sessions include:
|
Micro-Watershed
1st Round |
Covered
Municipalities and
Cities |
|
Muntinlupa
|
Muntinlupa City |
|
Pagsanjan |
Pagsanjan, Lucban,
Luisiana, Majayjay,
Cavinti, Famy,
Kalayaan, and Lumban |
|
Tanay
|
Tanay
|
|
Calauan |
Bay, Calauan, and
Alaminos |
|
Morong-Teresa |
Morong and Teresa
Angono-Binangonan-Cardona |
|
Sta.
Cruz
|
Sta.
Cruz, Nagcarlan.
Liliw and Magdalena |
|
Siniloan
|
Siniloan and Famy |
|
Sta. Rosa |
Sta. Rosa |
|
Los Baños-Mt.
Makiling
|
Los Baños |
|
Biñan
|
Biñan, Carmona |
|
San
Pedro
|
San Pedro, Tagaytay,
GMA, Silang |
| |
|
Micro-Watershed
2nd Round |
Covered
Municipalities and
Cities |
|
Taguig
|
Taguig, Pasig,
Parañaque, Pateros,
Taytay, Cainta
|
|
San
Cristobal
|
Calamba, Cabuyao,
Sta. Rosa, Silang,
Tagaytay, Tanauan |
|
San
Juan
|
Sto.
Tomas, Tanauan ,
Lipa, Malvar, Los
Baños, Alaminos,
Bay, Calamba |
|
Seven
Lakes
|
San Pablo, Nagcarlan,
Rizal |
|
Pila
|
Pila, Victoria,
Nagcarlan, Sta.
Cruz, San Pablo,
Calauan |
|
Pangil
|
Pangil, Kalayaan,
Pakil, Paete, Real,
Lumban, and Siniloan,
Sta. Maria-Mabitac Famy
|
|
Jala-Jala
|
Jala-Jala, Pililia,
Mabitac |
|
Pililia
|
Pililia , Tanay |
|
Baras
|
Baras, Tanay, Morong |
|
Sapang Baho
|
Antipolo, Taytay,
Cainta, Angono, San
Mateo, Marikina,
Pasig |
|
Mapandan
|
Antipolo, Rodriguez,
San Mateo, Tanay,
Baras, Quezon City,
Marikina, Pateros,
|
These sub-projects
contributed to a measurable
reduction in environmental
pressures of the lake in
terms of reduced amount of
solid wastes and reduction
in BOD and TSS . These also
generated a total of 872
jobs directly and indirectly
hired that included vendors,
wastepickers, IPs and
additional personnel hired
during peak season (eco-tourism).
MRF and
Sanitary Landfill
The
LISCOP project has financed
17 MRFs and a Sanitary
Landfill wherein solid
wastes are properly
processed through
segregation, reuse and
recycling. It also resulted
to the closure and
rehabiliation of open
dumpsites as part of the
general solid waste
management strategy of the
project.
Wastewater
Treatment Facility
Two
WWTFs (Nagcarlan and Sta.
Cruz) are already
operational and have both
contributed in the reduction
of BOD, thereby, enabling
these LGUs to comply with
the effluent standards.
Since its operations,
treated effluent discharge
of these facilities have
improved. For 2010, average
BOD discharge after
treatment is 13.5 mg/L and
28 mg/L for 2011.
Eco-tourism / enhancement
Sub-projects have been
generating revenues for the
recipient LGUs. The revenues
from these facilities assist
the LGU in the maintenance
of the site and safeguarding
the quality if the water
bodies and the watersheds.
Flood
Control
Testimonies
from Taytay and Baras
stakeholders indicated that
these sub-projects resulted
to quick abatement of
flooding in the sub-project
areas.
From January
to June 2011, actual revenue
the three sub-projects are
reflected below:
|
Tanay Daranak Falls |
Php
691,722.50 |
|
Panguil
Eco-Park |
Php
1,488,728.00 |
|
Pakil Eco-Heritage
Park |
Php
1,171,030.00 |
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
Php 3,351,480.50 |
Impacts and Benefits
-
Closure of 17
dumpsites and upgrading
of 23 out of the 41 LGU-operated
dumps in the Laguna de
Bay Basin
-
Decrease by
53.22% in volume of
solid wastes dumped into
open areas, waterways
and the lake due to the
establishments of MRF in
17 municipalities.
-
The establishment
and operation of
composting facilities in
seventeen (17)
municipalities have
contributed to the
reduction of methane
emissions
-
The Flood Control
SPs in Baras, Tanay and
Taytay, Rizal, have
reduced the impact of
flooding.
-
The LISCOP
Project has paved the
way towards establishing
LGUs’ own identities,
thereby developing a
sense of pride and
credibility among its
constituents
-
The establishment
of various LGU
sub-projects has
generated livelihood
opportunities for the
communities including
the marginalized sector.
About 462 individuals
were hired to provide
services to the various
sub-projects
-
The LGU-proponents
have established
partnerships among
various sectors and have
laid the groundwork for
further collaboration
-
Propelled LGUs to
formulate ordinances in
support to the effective
implementation of the
sub-project
-
The LGUs as well
as the LLDA have built
up institutional
capabilities on various
aspects of project
preparation, appraisal,
implementation and
management
Lessons Learned
-
Involvement of
all stakeholders is an
essential element to
success but the
existence of a project
CHAMPION assures project
sustainability
-
Link
environmental projects
with economic
development
-
Natural and
man-made events can
create an almost instant
demand
-
Donors field
visits are crucial to
improve project
performance, Clarify
issues and resolve
conflicts
-
Project
implementation requires
flexibility and thrives
on open and creative
interactions among
partners
-
Discover & unveil
the uniqueness and
potentials of resources
-
Need for
increased capacity for
local governance
|

|
|
|
|